AI Infrastructure & LLMOps

AI Architecture

Without a reference architecture, every team independently picks a model, a vector store, an orchestration approach and a way of handling secrets. We define the shared architecture that makes the second and fifth AI system cheaper than the first.

The business problem

Nothing compounds

The first AI system is expensive because everything is new. The fifth should be cheap and usually is not, because each team solved the same problems differently. Now there are five ways of calling a model, five approaches to evaluation, five secret stores and no ability to move traffic between providers. The cost is paid twice: once in duplicated build, and again when something needs to change everywhere at once.

What we do

Define the shared layer and its boundaries

We design the layer that should be common, model access, retrieval, orchestration, evaluation, observability and secrets, and are equally explicit about what should stay with the application, because over-centralising creates a bottleneck. The architecture is written to keep provider choice reversible, so a model decision does not become an architectural commitment. We validate it against two or three real use cases rather than shipping a diagram.

AI Architecture

Capabilities

  • Enterprise AI Architecture

  • LLM Architecture

  • RAG Architecture

  • Agent Architecture

  • AI Platform Architecture

  • Cloud AI Architecture

  • Hybrid AI

  • Private AI Architecture

Common use cases

Common use cases

  • Establish a reference architecture before a portfolio of AI projects starts in parallel.
  • Consolidate several teams' divergent implementations onto shared infrastructure.
  • Design for a jurisdiction or isolation requirement that rules out the default cloud path.
  • Review an architecture that is proving expensive to change.

How we deliver

How we deliver

  1. Assess

    Establish the constraints: residency, latency, spend and what already runs.

  2. Architect

    Design gateway, routing, caching and failover so provider choice stays reversible.

  3. Instrument

    Observability, evaluation and cost attribution wired in before traffic arrives.

  4. Operate

    Run it against agreed service levels, with capacity and spend reviewed on a cycle.

Technology

Technology

  • Kubernetes
  • Terraform
  • vLLM
  • Ollama
  • LiteLLM
  • OpenTelemetry
  • Prometheus
  • Grafana
  • AWS
  • Microsoft Azure

Security & governance

Security & governance

Where data may be processed is a configuration, not an assumption: models can run in your own cloud tenancy or on your own hardware where residency or isolation requires it. Traffic through the gateway is authenticated, attributed to a team and logged, which is what makes both the audit trail and the cost model possible.

Engagement models

Engagement models

AI Project

We take responsibility for designing and delivering a defined AI solution.

Dedicated AI Team

Long-term dedicated engineering capacity built around your stack and delivery model.

Managed AI

We operate, monitor and continuously improve production AI systems.

Why TeamExtension.ai

We validate architectures by building on them

An architecture that has never carried a real workload is a hypothesis. We test the design against actual use cases during the engagement, which surfaces the wrong assumptions while they are still cheap to correct. It also keeps the document honest about what is genuinely shared and what only looked shared on a diagram.

Selected clients

Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Should we build a platform or let teams choose?
Somewhere between, and the line matters more than the choice. Centralise model access, evaluation, observability and secrets, because those benefit from consistency. Leave application logic and user experience with the teams, because centralising those creates a queue.
How do we avoid vendor lock-in?
By routing model calls through a gateway with a stable internal interface, so provider choice is configuration. Complete portability is not achievable because model behaviour differs, but the cost of switching can be made a week rather than a quarter.
Do we need a dedicated vector database?
Often not. pgvector in existing PostgreSQL serves many enterprise workloads without new infrastructure to operate. A dedicated store earns its place at scale or for specific features, not by default.
How long does this take?
Six to ten weeks including validation against real use cases. Shorter engagements produce a document; the validation is what makes it an architecture.

Discuss Your AI Initiative

Design the reference architecture your AI systems share: models, retrieval, orchestration, data and controls.